Vision-e vs Contextual Time and Location

Based on the data on this page, Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Contextual Time and Location's 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Contextual Time and Location offers a free tier (free) while Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has the larger user base (147 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Contextual Time and Location's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects.; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Contextual Time and Location's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects.'s broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. or Contextual Time and Location cheaper?

Contextual Time and Location is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. or Contextual Time and Location?

Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 147 reviews) compared to Contextual Time and Location (2.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. or Contextual Time and Location?

Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 2.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. or Contextual Time and Location?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has the deeper published review base (147 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.