Loading content…
Vision-e vs Check-in
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Vision-e | Check-in | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Vision-e | Check-in | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. | Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 147 | 15 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2013 | Aug 2011 |
Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. and Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. at paid, Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has the larger user base (147 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. audit • Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Vision-e | Check-in |
|---|---|---|
| geolocation | #8 | #53 |
Both Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. and Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location offer paid plans only. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. starts at paid; Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. (4.9★, 147 reviews) and Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location (4.9★, 15 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has more onboarding documentation maturity (147 reviews vs 15), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (147 reviews). Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (15 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. and Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.