Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Avoid burnout and keep your business profitable with the most intuitive resource management, forecasting, and time tracking app available on the Salesforce AppExchange.
| Resource Hero | Native Project | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Native Project management across industries: Intuitive UI, Gantt, Schedule, and Kanban visualization; Clone projects, Task and Milestone dependency, timesheet tracking, and resource management. Flexible interfaces and automation to fit your exact needs
| Metric | Resource Hero | Native Project |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 51 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2013 | Mar 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Resource Hero is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Native Project's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Resource Hero at paid, Native Project at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Resource Hero; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Native Project's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Resource Hero's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Resource Hero audit • Native Project audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Resource Hero | Native Project |
|---|---|---|
| workload availability | #2 | #5 |
Both Resource Hero and Native Project offer paid plans only. Resource Hero starts at paid; Native Project starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Resource Hero does carry the larger published review base (51 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Resource Hero has the deeper published review base (51 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Resource Hero typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (51 reviews). Native Project typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Resource Hero and Native Project both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Native Project" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
