Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Portwood | Documill Dynamo – Document Automation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Enterprise-grade document automation: Document generation, workflow automation & e-signing. Contract creation (+ quotes, proposals & reports) + PDF generation using DOCX, PPTX, XLSX and HTML templates & document workflows. Try free for 30 days!
| Metric | Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native | Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 148 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 17 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2026 | Aug 2013 |
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native offers a free tier (free) while Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign has the larger user base (148 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native audit • Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Portwood | Documill Dynamo – Document Automation |
|---|---|---|
| document automation | Not ranked | #1 |
| automate document generation | Not ranked | #2 |
| sign document | Not ranked | #2 |
| generation platform | #6 | Not ranked |
| pdf word | #6 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native (5.0★, 25 reviews) and Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign (5.0★, 148 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign has the deeper published review base (148 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (148 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native and Documill Dynamo – Document Automation: Generate, Review, Track, and E-sign both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Portwood: Document Generation & E-Signature for Salesforce | Free, 100% Native" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
