Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Conga CLM is an AI-powered, scalable solution that automates contract creation, negotiation, and execution. Built on the Conga Revenue Lifecycle Platform, it boosts compliance, visibility, and speed to help teams close deals faster and reduce risk.
| Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management | Flow Components by Englhard Consulting | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Flow is a powerful tool built for every Admin. Extend your Flows with various components to use inside Flow that allow you to do things like Redirect a Flow to a newly created record or send selected records from a related list or list view into Flow.
| Metric | Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management | Flow Components by Englhard Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 103 | 19 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2006 | Mar 2019 |
Flow Components by Englhard Consulting edges out Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, Flow Components by Englhard Consulting offers a free tier (free) while Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management has the larger user base (103 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Flow Components by Englhard Consulting's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Flow Components by Englhard Consulting; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management 's 103-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Flow Components by Englhard Consulting's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management audit • Flow Components by Englhard Consulting audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management | Flow Components by Englhard Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| contract management | #1 | Not ranked |
| contract lifecycle management | #1 | Not ranked |
| lifecycle management | #1 | Not ranked |
| creating | Not ranked | #5 |
| survey builder | Not ranked | #65 |
Flow Components by Englhard Consulting is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Flow Components by Englhard Consulting has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 19 reviews) compared to Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management (4.7★ from 103 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Flow Components by Englhard Consulting is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management has more onboarding documentation maturity (103 reviews vs 19), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (103 reviews). Flow Components by Englhard Consulting aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (19 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Conga CLM | Contract Lifecycle Management and Flow Components by Englhard Consulting both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flow Components by Englhard Consulting" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.