Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | vs Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector

Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector edges out Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) at paid, Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF)'s 94-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) or Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector cheaper?

Both Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) and Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector offer paid plans only. Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) starts at paid; Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) or Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector?

Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) (4.8★ from 94 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) or Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector?

Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) or Engaging Networks Salesforce Connector?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Campaign Monitor for Salesforce | Email Marketing & Mass Email (CM4SF) has the deeper published review base (94 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.