Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Quickly setup Campaign Status Defaults to one or many campaigns. Stop setting up Campaign Member Statuses every time. Define defaults by Campaign Type and let the system assign them automatically.
| AAkonsult Campaign Status | Apteco | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | AAkonsult Campaign Status | Apteco |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 73 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 3 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2012 | Sep 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, AAkonsult Campaign Status is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Apteco's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: AAkonsult Campaign Status at paid, Apteco at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to AAkonsult Campaign Status; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Apteco's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AAkonsult Campaign Status's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AAkonsult Campaign Status audit • Apteco audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AAkonsult Campaign Status | Apteco |
|---|---|---|
| setup campaign | #1 | Not ranked |
| campaign type | #2 | Not ranked |
| campaign | #3 | Not ranked |
| audience | Not ranked | #9 |
Both AAkonsult Campaign Status and Apteco offer paid plans only. AAkonsult Campaign Status starts at paid; Apteco starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. AAkonsult Campaign Status does carry the larger published review base (73 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AAkonsult Campaign Status has the deeper published review base (73 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AAkonsult Campaign Status typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (73 reviews). Apteco typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AAkonsult Campaign Status and Apteco both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Apteco" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
