Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Join thousands of leading loss prevention (LP), risk, and safety professionals protecting people and profit on ThinkLP. Our simple to use, front-line tools make incident reporting, investigations, automated task assignment and audits easy for everyone.
| ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management | Lightning Poller | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
An ability to do long polling that can be tied to a Apex action/method to check status etc.
| Metric | ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management | Lightning Poller |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 22 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Listed features | 3 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2014 | Jan 2018 |
ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management and Lightning Poller are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, Lightning Poller offers a free tier (free) while ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management audit • Lightning Poller audit
| — |
No features listed.
| Keyword | ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management | Lightning Poller |
|---|---|---|
| poll | Not ranked | #1 |
| reporting and grant-making | #6 | Not ranked |
Lightning Poller is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management (5.0★, 22 reviews) and Lightning Poller (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management does carry the larger published review base (22 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management has the deeper published review base (22 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). Lightning Poller typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ThinkLP Loss Prevention Management and Lightning Poller both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lightning Poller" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.