Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The all-in-one NATIVE solution for deduplication: find & merge duplicates in and across leads, contacts, accounts and any (custom) object. Prevent duplicates on manual entry, import and API insert. ➤ Get it Now = production trial ➤ Try it = sandbox trial
| Duplicate Check for Salesforce | GRAX for Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
GRAX is the leader in Salesforce Data Protection throughout its lifecycle, where you can own and control 100% of your data while supporting your Customer 360 goals. Click "Get It Now" to start protecting & reusing your Salesforce backup and archive data!
| Metric | Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy | GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 302 | 32 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 6 | 3 |
| Languages | 5 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2011 | Aug 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy at freemium, GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy has the larger user base (302 reviews vs 32), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy's 302-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy audit • GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Duplicate Check for Salesforce | GRAX for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| plauti | #1 | Not ranked |
| deduplication and | #2 | Not ranked |
| merge and prevent | #2 | Not ranked |
| data protection | Not ranked | #8 |
| salesforce data | Not ranked | #9 |
No tracked changes.
Both Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy and GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse offer paid plans only. Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy starts at freemium; GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 32 reviews) compared to Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy (4.6★ from 302 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy has the deeper published review base (302 vs 32), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (302 reviews). GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Duplicate Check for Salesforce: Duplicate Management made easy and GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GRAX for Salesforce: Backup & Recovery, Archive, Data Pipelines, and Reuse" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.