Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LuGo-Test | Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Save time and increase productivity when you initiate background check requests, review results and access detailed reports - all within Salesforce. Visit Sterling Volunteers to get started: https://www.sterlingvolunteers.com/resources/salesforce
| Metric | LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments | Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 2.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 11 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2011 | Jul 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments at paid, Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments audit • Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | LuGo-Test | Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks |
|---|---|---|
| volunteers | Not ranked | #1 |
| volunteer | Not ranked | #4 |
| trial today | #5 | Not ranked |
| average | #7 | Not ranked |
| without coding | #7 | Not ranked |
Both LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments and Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks offer paid plans only. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments starts at paid; Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks (2.8★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the deeper published review base (11 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments and Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sterling Volunteers | Portable Background Checks" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.