Loading content…
GridMate vs Fonteva Membership
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Fonteva Membership | GridMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fonteva Membership | GridMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
Fonteva Membership is an Association Management Software built on the Salesforce platform.
| Metric | Fonteva Membership | GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 138 | 133 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2011 | Sep 2019 |
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar edges out Fonteva Membership on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Fonteva Membership at paid, GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fonteva Membership's 138-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fonteva Membership audit • GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Fonteva Membership | GridMate |
|---|---|---|
| provides | #6 | #1 |
| freeform | #51 | #6 |
| poll | #74 | #27 |
| form | #67 | #109 |
| forms | #86 | #117 |
No tracked changes.
Both Fonteva Membership and GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar offer paid plans only. Fonteva Membership starts at paid; GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 133 reviews) compared to Fonteva Membership (4.8★ from 138 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Fonteva Membership has the deeper published review base (138 vs 133), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fonteva Membership typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (138 reviews). GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (133 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fonteva Membership and GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GridMate: Inline Editing, Smart Related List & List View Grids, Multi Calendar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.