Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cloudingo | Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
Advanced Field History Tracker (AFHT) — your ultimate solution for comprehensive field history tracking and seamless data restoration within Salesforce. Unlike standard tracking features, AFHT empowers you to monitor and manage changes to your data.
| Metric | Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality | Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 559 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2012 | Oct 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)'s 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) offers a free tier (freemium) while Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the larger user base (559 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)'s 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality audit • Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cloudingo | Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce data | #1 | Not ranked |
| inventory management | #1 | Not ranked |
| management system | #2 | Not ranked |
| advance | Not ranked | #6 |
| field history | Not ranked | #7 |
Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 559 reviews) compared to Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) (2.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality has the deeper published review base (559 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (559 reviews). Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cloudingo: Remove duplicates and improve data quality and Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
