Salesforce Adoption Dashboards vs Smart Field History Tracker

Based on the data on this page, Smart Field History Tracker is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Salesforce Adoption Dashboards's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Salesforce Adoption Dashboards offers a free tier (free) while Smart Field History Tracker starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Salesforce Adoption Dashboards has the larger user base (844 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Smart Field History Tracker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Smart Field History Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Salesforce Adoption Dashboards's 844-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Smart Field History Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Salesforce Adoption Dashboards or Smart Field History Tracker cheaper?

Salesforce Adoption Dashboards is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Smart Field History Tracker starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Salesforce Adoption Dashboards or Smart Field History Tracker?

Smart Field History Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to Salesforce Adoption Dashboards (4.6★ from 844 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Salesforce Adoption Dashboards or Smart Field History Tracker?

Smart Field History Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Salesforce Adoption Dashboards or Smart Field History Tracker?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Salesforce Adoption Dashboards has the deeper published review base (844 vs 16), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Salesforce Adoption Dashboards typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (844 reviews). Smart Field History Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.