Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Helpful for Chatter compliance use cases, Chatter Delete Blocker allows administrator to block Chatter deletions. This application is highly customizable to suit a wide variety of use cases. It can block both Chatter feed posts and comments.
| Chatter Delete Blocker | Alfred | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Chatter Delete Blocker | Alfred |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 30 | 19 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | free | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | — | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 2 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 15 supported |
| Listed since | May 2011 | May 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Alfred is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Chatter Delete Blocker's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Chatter Delete Blocker at free, Alfred at freemium. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Alfred; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Chatter Delete Blocker's 30-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Alfred's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chatter Delete Blocker audit • Alfred audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Chatter Delete Blocker | Alfred |
|---|---|---|
| chatter feed | #1 | Not ranked |
| updates | Not ranked | #3 |
| chatter | #4 | Not ranked |
| chatter unfollow rules | #5 | Not ranked |
| your own | Not ranked | #8 |
No tracked changes.
Both Chatter Delete Blocker and Alfred offer paid plans only. Chatter Delete Blocker starts at free; Alfred starts at freemium. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Alfred has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 19 reviews) compared to Chatter Delete Blocker (4.0★ from 30 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Alfred holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Chatter Delete Blocker has the deeper published review base (30 vs 19), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Chatter Delete Blocker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (30 reviews). Alfred typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chatter Delete Blocker and Alfred both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Alfred" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.