Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Map the key Players in your strategic projects Connect online to Player's LinkedIn profiles Real-time coaching to help ensure you win Proven worldwide to increase sales win rate Please call 1.855.921.2550 to Player Map it
| PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 16 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2012 | Aug 2019 |
Orca edges out PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) at paid, Orca at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Orca; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX)'s 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Orca's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) audit • Orca audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| advocates | Not ranked | #2 |
| join | #8 | Not ranked |
| relationship map | #8 | Not ranked |
| map org chart | #9 | Not ranked |
| marketing roi | Not ranked | #9 |
Both PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) and Orca offer paid plans only. PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) starts at paid; Orca starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Orca has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) (4.8★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Orca holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Orca has the deeper published review base (16 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Orca typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX) and Orca both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PLAYER MAP X-Ray (PMX)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.