Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce | Grids | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
PatronManager is a full feature CRM that combines sophisticated box office ticketing and subscriptions, fundraising tools, email marketing, and specialized reporting and tracking for all types of ticket-selling organizations.
| Metric | PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce | Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 45 | ★ 59 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2011 | Aug 2021 |
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management edges out PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce at paid, Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce's 45-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce audit • Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce | Grids |
|---|---|---|
| inline editing | Not ranked | #2 |
| interface | Not ranked | #2 |
| bring neighborhood-level | Not ranked | #4 |
| membership | #10 | Not ranked |
| event ticketing | #12 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce and Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management offer paid plans only. PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce starts at paid; Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 59 reviews) compared to PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce (4.9★ from 45 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management has the deeper published review base (59 vs 45), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (45 reviews). Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce and Grids: Related List Views, Inline Edit, Reporting, Data Management both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PatronManager - Native Ticketing, Fundraising and Memberships in Salesforce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
