Loading content…
Check-in vs Vision-e
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Check-in | Vision-e | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Check-in | Vision-e | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location | Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 15 | ★ 147 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2011 | Jan 2013 |
Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location and Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location at paid, Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has the larger user base (147 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location audit • Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Check-in | Vision-e |
|---|---|---|
| geolocation | #8 | #5 |
Both Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location and Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. offer paid plans only. Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location starts at paid; Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location (4.9★, 15 reviews) and Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. (4.9★, 147 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. has more onboarding documentation maturity (147 reviews vs 15), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (15 reviews). Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (147 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location and Vision-e: Create Maps for Salesforce Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects. both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Check-in: Field Sales & Field Service Management with Real Time Location" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.