Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Running your business—including processing customer and vendor payments—in one system sharing the same database is possible with accounting software built entirely on Salesforce.
| Accounting on Salesforce | Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Leverage the power of Salesforce reporting to track your Monthly Recurring Revenue in the way MRR was meant to be tracked: monthly 100% Native Salesforce App | Set Up in Minutes | Dynamic MRR, ARR, and NRR Data Customized to Your Business Process
| Metric | Accounting on Salesforce | Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 428 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2011 | Jan 2020 |
Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker edges out Accounting on Salesforce on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Accounting on Salesforce at paid, Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Accounting on Salesforce has the larger user base (428 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accounting on Salesforce's 428-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Accounting on Salesforce audit • Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Accounting on Salesforce | Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| recurring | Not ranked | #1 |
| accounting | #2 | Not ranked |
| software on | #2 | Not ranked |
| retail | #2 | Not ranked |
| revenue | Not ranked | #7 |
Both Accounting on Salesforce and Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker offer paid plans only. Accounting on Salesforce starts at paid; Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Accounting on Salesforce (4.8★ from 428 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Accounting on Salesforce has the deeper published review base (428 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Accounting on Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (428 reviews). Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Accounting on Salesforce and Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Field Guide | Monthly Recurring Revenue Tracker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.