Accounting on Salesforce vs FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing

Based on the data on this page, Accounting on Salesforce is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Accounting on Salesforce at paid, FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Accounting on Salesforce has the larger user base (428 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Accounting on Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Accounting on Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Accounting on Salesforce or FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing cheaper?

Both Accounting on Salesforce and FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing offer paid plans only. Accounting on Salesforce starts at paid; FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Accounting on Salesforce or FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Accounting on Salesforce does carry the larger published review base (428 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Accounting on Salesforce or FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Accounting on Salesforce has the deeper published review base (428 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Accounting on Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (428 reviews). FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Accounting on Salesforce and FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing?

Migration support varies by app and category. Accounting on Salesforce and FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.