Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Running your business—including processing customer and vendor payments—in one system sharing the same database is possible with accounting software built entirely on Salesforce.
| Accounting on Salesforce | Symphonix by Q2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Unify, connect and automate the entire loan/lease lifecycle, from application, onboarding, servicing and collections all via Salesforce. Reduce costs, risk and create better customer experiences through integration, automation and superior workflow.
| Metric | Accounting on Salesforce | Symphonix by Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 428 | 14 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2011 | Jul 2012 |
Symphonix by Q2 edges out Accounting on Salesforce on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Accounting on Salesforce at paid, Symphonix by Q2 at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Accounting on Salesforce has the larger user base (428 reviews vs 14), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Symphonix by Q2's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Symphonix by Q2; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accounting on Salesforce's 428-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Symphonix by Q2's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Accounting on Salesforce audit • Symphonix by Q2 audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Accounting on Salesforce | Symphonix by Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| office on salesforce-native | #1 | Not ranked |
| accounting | #1 | Not ranked |
| nonprofits | #1 | Not ranked |
| unify your front | Not ranked | #4 |
| form | Not ranked | #85 |
No tracked changes.
Both Accounting on Salesforce and Symphonix by Q2 offer paid plans only. Accounting on Salesforce starts at paid; Symphonix by Q2 starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Symphonix by Q2 has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to Accounting on Salesforce (4.8★ from 428 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Accounting on Salesforce fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Symphonix by Q2 is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Accounting on Salesforce has more onboarding documentation maturity (428 reviews vs 14), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Accounting on Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (428 reviews). Symphonix by Q2 aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (14 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Accounting on Salesforce and Symphonix by Q2 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Symphonix by Q2" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
