Loading content…
CloudComp vs RevenueCloud
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| RevenueCloud | CloudComp | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| RevenueCloud | CloudComp | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
RevenueCloud empowers you to enhance your Sales Cloud data for your Splits, Commissions, Revenue Recognition, Pipeline and Forecasting needs, without changes to your standard data or the or custom development. Integrates seamlessly with CPQ and CloudComp!
| Metric | RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules | CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 19 | 13 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2010 | Nov 2013 |
RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules and CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules at paid, CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules audit • CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | RevenueCloud | CloudComp |
|---|---|---|
| compensation | #5 | #1 |
| sales compensation | #7 | #1 |
| sales commission | #11 | #1 |
| commission management | #11 | #1 |
| incentive compensation | #12 | #5 |
Both RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules and CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM offer paid plans only. RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules starts at paid; CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules (5.0★, 19 reviews) and CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM (5.0★, 13 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules does carry the larger published review base (19 vs 13). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules has the deeper published review base (19 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. RevenueCloud: Opportunity Splits, Sales Commissions, Revenue Schedules and CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CloudComp: Sales Commissions, Incentive Compensation, Quota Management, SPM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.