Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Inbox Monster helps email teams send epic messages to every inbox. With creative rendering and deliverability tools, you can find your email rawwwr.
| iContact for Salesforce | | Inbox Monster | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
Easy to use email marketing platform for small businesses. Create and send stunning emails to your customers in minutes - without having to leave Salesforce.
| Metric | iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages | Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 283 | 13 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2010 | Aug 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages at paid, Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages has the larger user base (283 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages's 283-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages audit • Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud audit
| — |
| Keyword | iContact for Salesforce | | Inbox Monster |
|---|---|---|
| mass emails | #6 | #11 |
| mass email | #9 | #10 |
| marketing automation | #12 | #12 |
Both iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages and Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud offer paid plans only. iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages starts at paid; Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages (4.6★ from 283 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages has the deeper published review base (283 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (283 reviews). Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. iContact for Salesforce | Email Marketing, Mass Email, Landing Pages and Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Inbox Monster Email Deliverability for Marketing Cloud" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
