Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The ultimate Post Market Surveillance solution for the Medical Device Industry. Complaint Handling Complaints Agency Reporting (PSUR and others) Adverse Event Reporting Recall Management Product Registration MDR MIR CVR Regulatory Reports MDREngine
| FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
With Professional Services Cloud from Certinia, you can manage your resources, projects, and financials in the same application as your customer interactions—to improve your enterprise margin and growth.
| Metric | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 118 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 7 | 6 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2009 | May 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)'s 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) at paid, Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) has the larger user base (118 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)'s 118-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) audit • Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance |
|---|---|---|
| and streamline | #3 | Not ranked |
| the same | #5 | Not ranked |
| services teams | #6 | Not ranked |
| reporting and grant-making | Not ranked | #8 |
| clean up decisions | Not ranked | #10 |
Both FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance offer paid plans only. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) starts at paid; Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) (4.7★ from 118 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) has the deeper published review base (118 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (118 reviews). Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Smarteeva Post Market Surveillance" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.