Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | iCherub | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
With Professional Services Cloud from Certinia, you can manage your resources, projects, and financials in the same application as your customer interactions—to improve your enterprise margin and growth.
| Metric | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | iCherub |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 118 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 7 | 3 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2009 | Nov 2016 |
Based on the data on this page, iCherub is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)'s 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) at paid, iCherub at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) has the larger user base (118 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. iCherub's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to iCherub; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)'s 118-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than iCherub's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) audit • iCherub audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | iCherub |
|---|---|---|
| parent or child | Not ranked | #2 |
| and streamline | #3 | Not ranked |
| the same | #5 | Not ranked |
| services teams | #6 | Not ranked |
| management automated communications | Not ranked | #12 |
Both FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) and iCherub offer paid plans only. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) starts at paid; iCherub starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
iCherub has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) (4.7★ from 118 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
iCherub holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) has the deeper published review base (118 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (118 reviews). iCherub typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) and iCherub both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from iCherub" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
