Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Native Time & Expense solution supporting Multi-Currency Expense and PerDiem management and Billing, Project planning (SoW) tracking and billing, Customer Approvals, Vacation tracking, Payroll reporting, etc. - capture on the fly via Mobile.
| Time&Expense Project | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Keep your focus on Salesforce while directly accessing your data in Teams, SharePoint sites, and Document Libraries. Easily work with the latest file versions with just one click. Compatible with all Salesforce Editions, including Mobile and Communities.
| Metric | Time&Expense Project | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 32 | 22 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 17 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 7 |
| Languages | 3 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2009 | Nov 2019 |
Time&Expense Project and Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Time&Expense Project at paid, Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Time&Expense Project audit • Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Time&Expense Project | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| time expense | #1 | Not ranked |
| microsoft 365 | Not ranked | #2 |
| expense | #3 | Not ranked |
| teams | Not ranked | #6 |
| microsoft teams | Not ranked | #8 |
Both Time&Expense Project and Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint offer paid plans only. Time&Expense Project starts at paid; Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time&Expense Project (5.0★, 32 reviews) and Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint (5.0★, 22 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Time&Expense Project has the deeper published review base (32 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Time&Expense Project typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Time&Expense Project and Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.