Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
This package gives you reports and a dashboard to monitor usage of your Force.com sites. Analyze monthly page views, daily bandwidth, and daily request time to avoid reaching monthly and daily limits for individual sites and your organization.
| Force.com Sites Usage Reporting | HandsOn Connect | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Built in partnership with Points of Light, the world’s largest organization dedicated to volunteer service, HandsOn Connect offers a flexible and scalable solution for volunteer engagement.
| Metric | Force.com Sites Usage Reporting | HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 10 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 5 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2009 | Jul 2016 |
Based on the data on this page, HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Force.com Sites Usage Reporting's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Force.com Sites Usage Reporting offers a free tier (free) while HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Force.com Sites Usage Reporting's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Force.com Sites Usage Reporting audit • HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Force.com Sites Usage Reporting | HandsOn Connect |
|---|---|---|
| handson connect | Not ranked | #1 |
| site | #2 | Not ranked |
| your site | #2 | Not ranked |
| sites | #2 | Not ranked |
| volunteer | Not ranked | #6 |
Force.com Sites Usage Reporting is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 10 reviews) compared to Force.com Sites Usage Reporting (3.5★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement has the deeper published review base (10 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Force.com Sites Usage Reporting typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Force.com Sites Usage Reporting and HandsOn Connect: Your solution for volunteer engagement both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Force.com Sites Usage Reporting" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.