Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Chargent Payment Processing | MetaFlex | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
| Chargent Payment Processing | MetaFlex | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
- Accept credit card, ACH & subscription payments in Salesforce - Enable self-service payments in Experience Cloud - Automate recurring billing & collections - Gain real-time cash flow visibility 👉 Click ‘Try it Free’ to start your Trialforce demo
| Metric | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments | MetaFlex |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 528 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2009 | Apr 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs MetaFlex's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, MetaFlex offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (528 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MetaFlex's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MetaFlex's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit • MetaFlex audit
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Chargent Payment Processing | MetaFlex |
|---|---|---|
| freeform | #4 | Not ranked |
| jotform | #4 | Not ranked |
| poll | #10 | Not ranked |
MetaFlex is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MetaFlex is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (528 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (528 reviews). MetaFlex aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments and MetaFlex both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MetaFlex" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.