Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing vs Certinal eSign for Salesforce

Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Certinal eSign for Salesforce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Certinal eSign for Salesforce offers a free tier (free_to_install) while Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Certinal eSign for Salesforce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Certinal eSign for Salesforce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing or Certinal eSign for Salesforce cheaper?

Certinal eSign for Salesforce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free_to_install). Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing or Certinal eSign for Salesforce?

Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing or Certinal eSign for Salesforce?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the deeper published review base (529 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (529 reviews). Certinal eSign for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.