Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Excel.IO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Excel.IO |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 529 | 8 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2009 | Feb 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Excel.IO's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Excel.IO offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Excel.IO's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Excel.IO's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing audit • Excel.IO audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Excel.IO |
|---|---|---|
| commerce cloud | #1 | Not ranked |
| health | #1 | Not ranked |
| people | #1 | Not ranked |
| list views | Not ranked | #3 |
| list views or | Not ranked | #3 |
No tracked changes.
Excel.IO is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 529 reviews) compared to Excel.IO (3.8★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the deeper published review base (529 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (529 reviews). Excel.IO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing and Excel.IO both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Excel.IO" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
