Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Chargent Payment Processing | Companies House Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
This package contains a Flow to guide users through the search of Companies House for company details and then stores those details against the Account record. It also contains a component for viewing the Filing History for an Account held.
| Metric | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments | Companies House Search |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 529 | 15 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2009 | May 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs Companies House Search's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Companies House Search offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Companies House Search's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Companies House Search's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit • Companies House Search audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Chargent Payment Processing | Companies House Search |
|---|---|---|
| powerful flexible | #1 | Not ranked |
| processing | #1 | Not ranked |
| quickly | #1 | Not ranked |
| companies | Not ranked | #3 |
| record detail | Not ranked | #4 |
No tracked changes.
Companies House Search is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 529 reviews) compared to Companies House Search (4.1★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Companies House Search is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (529 reviews vs 15), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (529 reviews). Companies House Search aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (15 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments and Companies House Search both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Companies House Search" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.