Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
An upgraded version of the original Mass Update Contact Address, this allows copying of either Account standard address to either standard address on selected Contacts. Supports translations, column sorting, and more.
| Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Mass Update Contacts 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Mass Update Contacts 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 529 | 20 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 15 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2009 | Dec 2010 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs Mass Update Contacts 2.0's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Mass Update Contacts 2.0 offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 20), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mass Update Contacts 2.0's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mass Update Contacts 2.0's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing audit • Mass Update Contacts 2.0 audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing | Mass Update Contacts 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| standard or | #4 | #3 |
| standard and | #4 | #4 |
No tracked changes.
Mass Update Contacts 2.0 is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 529 reviews) compared to Mass Update Contacts 2.0 (4.5★ from 20 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing has the deeper published review base (529 vs 20), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (529 reviews). Mass Update Contacts 2.0 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chargent Payment Processing - Credit Card Payments, ACH, Recurring Billing and Mass Update Contacts 2.0 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mass Update Contacts 2.0" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.