Side-by-side comparison
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
How are your sales doing this year vs last year? How is your win rate doing against the target? Find these answers and more! This dashboard is using analytics features like multi axis charts and functions like PREVGROUPVAL, become familiar with it!
| Metric | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments | Sales History Advanced Dashboard |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 530 | 6 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 |
Chargent Payment Processing and Sales History Advanced Dashboard each lead on different measured dimensions — pick by the one that matters most to you.
Sales History Advanced Dashboard lists a free tier (free); Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments lists paid.
Built only from the Salesforce AppExchange listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit • Sales History Advanced Dashboard audit
| Field | Chargent Payment Processing | Sales History Advanced Dashboard |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
|---|
| Listed since | Mar 2009 | Aug 2010 |
|---|
| Listed |
|---|
| Keyword | Chargent Payment Processing | Sales History Advanced Dashboard |
|---|---|---|
| commerce cloud | #1 | Not ranked |
| order | #1 | Not ranked |
| and retain | #1 | Not ranked |
| against | Not ranked | #1 |
| win rate | Not ranked | #3 |
No tracked changes.
Sales History Advanced Dashboard is cheaper to start with — it offers a free plan and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments doesn't list one. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments's plans start at $667 / custom / month (USD). Prices are as listed on the Salesforce AppExchange; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 530 reviews) compared to Sales History Advanced Dashboard (4.0★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (530 vs 6).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Salesforce AppExchange data. What it can show: Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has 530 published reviews; Sales History Advanced Dashboard has 6 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments and Sales History Advanced Dashboard both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sales History Advanced Dashboard" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.