Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| TargetRecruit | NAO ERP Agentforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution | NAO ERP Agentforce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 197 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 6 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2008 | Feb 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.7★ vs NAO ERP Agentforce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, NAO ERP Agentforce offers a free tier (free) while TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (197 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. NAO ERP Agentforce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — NAO ERP Agentforce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit • NAO ERP Agentforce audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TargetRecruit | NAO ERP Agentforce |
|---|---|---|
| workflow | #46 | Not ranked |
| poll | #54 | Not ranked |
| survey | #105 | Not ranked |
NAO ERP Agentforce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; NAO ERP Agentforce is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has more onboarding documentation maturity (197 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (197 reviews). NAO ERP Agentforce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and NAO ERP Agentforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from NAO ERP Agentforce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
