Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| TargetRecruit | Ranger Fusion Package | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Transform your business with next-generation ERP modules. Finance (Accounting), Inventory, Procurement, Projects, Human Resource Management (HRM), Employee Self Service (ESS), Hire and Ken (Talent & Performance Management).
| Metric | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution | Ranger Fusion Package |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 198 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 6 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | May 2008 | Nov 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Ranger Fusion Package is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid, Ranger Fusion Package at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ranger Fusion Package's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Ranger Fusion Package; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 198-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ranger Fusion Package's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit • Ranger Fusion Package audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TargetRecruit | Ranger Fusion Package |
|---|---|---|
| front office | #1 | Not ranked |
| candidate | #1 | Not ranked |
| middle and back | #1 | Not ranked |
| gecko hrm | Not ranked | #3 |
| stock | Not ranked | #5 |
Both TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Ranger Fusion Package offer paid plans only. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid; Ranger Fusion Package starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Ranger Fusion Package has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.6★ from 198 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Ranger Fusion Package holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (198 reviews). Ranger Fusion Package typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Ranger Fusion Package both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ranger Fusion Package" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
