Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| TargetRecruit | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 197 | 9 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 11 supported |
| Listed since | May 2008 | Oct 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Print is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid, Print at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (197 reviews vs 9), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Print's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Print; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 197-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Print's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit • Print audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| workflow | #43 | Not ranked |
| poll | #54 | Not ranked |
| survey | #105 | Not ranked |
Both TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Print offer paid plans only. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid; Print starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Print has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.7★ from 197 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Print is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has more onboarding documentation maturity (197 reviews vs 9), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (197 reviews). Print aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (9 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Print both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Print" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
