TargetRecruit vs eatNgage

Based on the data on this page, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.6★ vs eatNgage's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid, eatNgage at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. eatNgage's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — eatNgage's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution or eatNgage cheaper?

Both TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and eatNgage offer paid plans only. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid; eatNgage starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution or eatNgage?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution does carry the larger published review base (198 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution or eatNgage?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (198 reviews). eatNgage typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and eatNgage?

Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and eatNgage both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from eatNgage" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.