Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| TargetRecruit | Accounting on Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Running your business—including processing customer and vendor payments—in one system sharing the same database is possible with accounting software built entirely on Salesforce.
| Metric | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution | Accounting on Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 197 | ★ 428 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2008 | Jun 2011 |
Accounting on Salesforce edges out TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid, Accounting on Salesforce at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Accounting on Salesforce has the larger user base (428 reviews vs 197), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Accounting on Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's 197-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Accounting on Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit • Accounting on Salesforce audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TargetRecruit | Accounting on Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| industry | #12 | #6 |
Both TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Accounting on Salesforce offer paid plans only. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid; Accounting on Salesforce starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Accounting on Salesforce has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 428 reviews) compared to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.7★ from 197 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Accounting on Salesforce is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Accounting on Salesforce has more onboarding documentation maturity (428 reviews vs 197), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (197 reviews). Accounting on Salesforce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (428 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and Accounting on Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
