Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
With Professional Services Cloud from Certinia, you can manage your resources, projects, and financials in the same application as your customer interactions—to improve your enterprise margin and growth.
| TargetRecruit | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| Metric | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 198 | 118 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 7 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | May 2008 | Nov 2009 |
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) are evenly matched on rating (4.6★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution at paid, FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (198 reviews vs 118), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit • FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TargetRecruit | FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) |
|---|---|---|
| and streamline | #6 | #3 |
| poll | #67 | #74 |
| workflow | #45 | #113 |
| freeform | #81 | #78 |
| survey | #105 | #101 |
Both TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) offer paid plans only. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid; FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution (4.6★, 198 reviews) and FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) (4.7★, 118 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the deeper published review base (198 vs 118), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (198 reviews). FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (118 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution and FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FinancialForce Professional Services Automation (PSA)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.