QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce vs Record-to-Web

Based on the data on this page, Record-to-Web is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce offers a free tier (free) while Record-to-Web starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce has the larger user base (532 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Record-to-Web's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Record-to-Web; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce's 532-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Record-to-Web's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration with Salesforce audit • Record-to-Web audit

• Browse the salesforce compare hub
• Browse all salesforce apps
• Compare metrics glossary