QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia vs CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)

Based on the data on this page, QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.7★ vs CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)'s 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia offers a free tier (free) while CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero) starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia has the larger user base (535 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)'s 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia or CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero) cheaper?

QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero) starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia or CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia does carry the larger published review base (535 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia or CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia has the deeper published review base (535 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

QuickBooks Online and Desktop Integration for Salesforce by DBSync / Avankia typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (535 reviews). CarryTheOne Accounting Integrations (e-conomic, FreshBooks, KashFlow, Xero) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.