Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Procurement for AppExchange enables companies to standardize purchase requests, streamline purchasing processes, and gather data to support requests for preferred pricing from vendors.
| Procurement | Q2 lending | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Unify, connect and automate the entire loan/ lease lifecycle, from application, onboarding, servicing and collections all via Salesforce. Reduce costs, risk and create better customer experiences through integration, automation and superior workflow.
| Metric | Procurement | Q2 lending |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 14 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2006 | Jul 2012 |
Based on the data on this page, Q2 lending is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 5.0★ vs Procurement's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Procurement offers a free tier (free) while Q2 lending starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Q2 lending; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Procurement's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Q2 lending's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Procurement audit • Q2 lending audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Procurement | Q2 lending |
|---|---|---|
| unify your front | Not ranked | #4 |
| form | Not ranked | #85 |
| order form | #101 | Not ranked |
| forms | Not ranked | #119 |
Procurement is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Q2 lending starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Q2 lending has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to Procurement (3.8★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Procurement fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Q2 lending is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Q2 lending has more onboarding documentation maturity (14 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Procurement typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (6 reviews). Q2 lending aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (14 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Procurement and Q2 lending both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Procurement" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
