Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Companies can use Class Enrollment for AppExchange to monitor student enrollment for the courses they offer and to track the internal — and external — classes their employees attend.
| Class Enrollment | TargetRecruit | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
TargetRecruit by Bullhorn is an enterprise ATS/CRM for staffing and recruiting firms. From front office to middle office, we’ve built our powerful and flexible software on Salesforce – the world’s #1 B2B SaaS platform.
| Metric | Class Enrollment | TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 19 | ★ 197 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2006 | May 2008 |
Based on the data on this page, TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.7★ vs Class Enrollment's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Class Enrollment offers a free tier (free) while TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the larger user base (197 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Class Enrollment's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Class Enrollment's 19-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Class Enrollment audit • TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Class Enrollment | TargetRecruit |
|---|---|---|
| poll | #98 | #50 |
Class Enrollment is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 197 reviews) compared to Class Enrollment (4.0★ from 19 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Class Enrollment fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution has more onboarding documentation maturity (197 reviews vs 19), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Class Enrollment typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (19 reviews). TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (197 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Class Enrollment and TargetRecruit: Staffing | Recruiting | Applicant Tracking Solution both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Class Enrollment" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
