Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce vs Lifeblood

Based on the data on this page, Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs Lifeblood's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Lifeblood offers a free tier (free) while Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce has the larger user base (3,200 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lifeblood's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lifeblood's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Adobe Acrobat Sign eSignatures for Salesforce audit • Lifeblood audit

• Browse the salesforce compare hub
• Browse all salesforce apps
• Compare metrics glossary