Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| QXchange | CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Leading Salesforce SharePoint integration and document automation tool. Built-in Flow actions to automate folder creation, sync record permissions, and share files from records with tracked access. Supports S3, Google Drive, Azure Blob and more.
| Metric | QXchange | CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 160 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 7 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2007 | Aug 2022 |
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform edges out QXchange on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: QXchange at paid, CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. QXchange's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — QXchange's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: QXchange audit • CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | QXchange | CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform |
|---|---|---|
| salesforce objects | Not ranked | #1 |
| access | Not ranked | #1 |
| cloudfiles | Not ranked | #2 |
| sql server | #6 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both QXchange and CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform offer paid plans only. QXchange starts at paid; CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 160 reviews) compared to QXchange (4.8★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform has the deeper published review base (160 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
QXchange typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (160 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. QXchange and CloudFiles | Document automation & sharing platform both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from QXchange" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
