Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
An effective and simple solution to compare two flow versions on your screen at the same time. Simple visualization assists you in understanding which elements were added, deleted, or changed, and an accessible log to check the data in a text version.
| Geopointe | Flow reviewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation | Flow reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 931 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2010 | Jun 2024 |
Flow reviewer edges out Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Flow reviewer offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Flow reviewer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Flow reviewer; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's 931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Flow reviewer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit • Flow reviewer audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Geopointe | Flow reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| plan | #1 | Not ranked |
| data from | #1 | Not ranked |
| insights and | #1 | Not ranked |
| simple and complex | Not ranked | #5 |
| changes over time | Not ranked | #6 |
Flow reviewer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Flow reviewer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation (4.9★ from 931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Flow reviewer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). Flow reviewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation and Flow reviewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flow reviewer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
