Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Geopointe | G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Install now at no cost and dive straight into managing your Salesforce data within the intuitive Google Sheets interface you already know. Automatic scheduled updates for SFDC reports inside Sheets and a lot more.
| Metric | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation | G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 931 | 27 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 7 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2010 | Nov 2014 |
Based on the data on this page, Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.9★ vs G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets)'s 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) offers a free tier (freemium) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets)'s 27-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit • G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Geopointe | G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) |
|---|---|---|
| plan | #1 | Not ranked |
| data from | #1 | Not ranked |
| insights and | #1 | Not ranked |
| google sheets | Not ranked | #3 |
| sheets | Not ranked | #5 |
G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 931 reviews) compared to G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) (4.5★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation and G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from G-Connector (formerly Enabler4Sheets)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
