Background Screening for Salesforce vs LuGo-Test

LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments edges out Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First at paid, LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First's 22-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments cheaper?

Both Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First and LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments offer paid plans only. Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First starts at paid; LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First (4.9★ from 22 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First or LuGo-Test: Staffing | Recruiting | Assessments?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Background Screening for Salesforce: Verified First has the deeper published review base (22 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.