Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
A powerful tool for administrators, to be able to create a dynamic list of records, thereby reducing custom development needs.
| Bulk Object Field Creator | CTK Dynamic Related List | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
BOFC 1.0 - Bulk CRUD, compare, clone & export Salesforce metadata without change sets. BOFC 2.0 (new) - Introduces "Dev Studio" — a native in-Org code editor for LWC, Apex, Aura, Triggers & Visualforce. Every change saved live. No external IDE needed.
| Metric | Bulk Object Field Creator | CTK Dynamic Related List |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 240 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 7 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2015 | Jan 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, Bulk Object Field Creator is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.7★ vs CTK Dynamic Related List's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, CTK Dynamic Related List offers a free tier (free) while Bulk Object Field Creator starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Bulk Object Field Creator has the larger user base (240 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CTK Dynamic Related List's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Bulk Object Field Creator; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CTK Dynamic Related List's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Bulk Object Field Creator's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Bulk Object Field Creator audit • CTK Dynamic Related List audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Bulk Object Field Creator | CTK Dynamic Related List |
|---|---|---|
| form creator | #2 | Not ranked |
| change | #2 | Not ranked |
| developers | #4 | Not ranked |
| release | Not ranked | #8 |
| display | Not ranked | #8 |
No tracked changes.
CTK Dynamic Related List is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Bulk Object Field Creator starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Bulk Object Field Creator has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 240 reviews) compared to CTK Dynamic Related List (3.0★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Bulk Object Field Creator holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Bulk Object Field Creator has the deeper published review base (240 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Bulk Object Field Creator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (240 reviews). CTK Dynamic Related List typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Bulk Object Field Creator and CTK Dynamic Related List both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CTK Dynamic Related List" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.