Bulk Object Field Creator vs Test Runner by Enxoo

Bulk Object Field Creator and Test Runner by Enxoo are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, Test Runner by Enxoo offers a free tier (free) while Bulk Object Field Creator starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Bulk Object Field Creator has the larger user base (240 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Test Runner by Enxoo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Bulk Object Field Creator or Test Runner by Enxoo cheaper?

Test Runner by Enxoo is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Bulk Object Field Creator starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Bulk Object Field Creator or Test Runner by Enxoo?

Bulk Object Field Creator (4.7★, 240 reviews) and Test Runner by Enxoo (4.8★, 4 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Bulk Object Field Creator or Test Runner by Enxoo?

Test Runner by Enxoo holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Bulk Object Field Creator or Test Runner by Enxoo?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Bulk Object Field Creator has the deeper published review base (240 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Bulk Object Field Creator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (240 reviews). Test Runner by Enxoo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Bulk Object Field Creator and Test Runner by Enxoo?

Migration support varies by app and category. Bulk Object Field Creator and Test Runner by Enxoo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Test Runner by Enxoo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.