Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
* simplifies updating records in flows * obeys FLS and dependent picklist options * saves you time in setting up forms in flows
| Outlook Integration for | Fast Flow Form (FFF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Capture Activities directly to Salesforce without compromises with the most robust integration. ✅ Sync Emails, Calendars, Leads on your own terms. ✅ 100% customizable ✅ Custom object supported ✅ Flexible deployment options ✅ 14 day Free trial
| Metric | Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid | Fast Flow Form (FFF) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 512 | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2015 | Apr 2020 |
Fast Flow Form (FFF) edges out Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid at freemium, Fast Flow Form (FFF) at free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Fast Flow Form (FFF)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Fast Flow Form (FFF); mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid's 512-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fast Flow Form (FFF)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid audit • Fast Flow Form (FFF) audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Outlook Integration for | Fast Flow Form (FFF) |
|---|---|---|
| free form | #99 | #6 |
Both Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Fast Flow Form (FFF) offer paid plans only. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid starts at freemium; Fast Flow Form (FFF) starts at free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Fast Flow Form (FFF) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid (4.8★ from 512 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Fast Flow Form (FFF) holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid has the deeper published review base (512 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (512 reviews). Fast Flow Form (FFF) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook Integration for Emails and Calendars - Revenue Grid and Fast Flow Form (FFF) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fast Flow Form (FFF)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
